Medical Coding Pro Newsletter - CMS Proposes New Glaucoma, Skin Cancer, Dementia Codes
Published: Mon, 06/27/11
As a benefit for being on our mailing list we are sending out a
weekly update including links to the most recent posts on our
blog. If you would like to read further just click one of the links.
Kind Regards,
The Medical Coding Pro Team
Great Deal On Practice Exams
http://www.medicalcodingpro.com/store.html
Medical Coding Pro Newsletter
The latest Medical Coding and Medical Billing News
http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress
CMS Proposes New Glaucoma, Skin Cancer, Dementia Codes - 2011-06-22 04:25:16-04
Many new codes abound in final update to proposed ICD-9-CM code set.
If you’ve felt that your skin cancer diagnoses could use a bit more specificity, ICD-9 will deliver this October if the proposed list of new, deleted, and revised diagnosis codes becomes final. The list of ICD-9 changes was recently posted to the CMS Website, and includes the final full set of changes that the agency will make to ICD-9 codes. After the new codes take effect on Oct. 1, CMS will only add new ICD- 9 codes on an emergency basis as it prepares to switch over the diagnosis coding system to ICD-10.
Seek Out Skin Cancer Changes
You’ll find a significant expansion to the 173.x (Other malignant neoplasm of skin) categories, including changes to 173.0x (…Skin of lip), 173.1x (Eyelid, including canthus), 173.2x (Skin of ear and external auditory canal), 173.3x (Skin of other and unspecified parts of face), 173.4x (Scalp and skin of neck), 173.5x (Skin of trunk, except scrotum), 173.6x (Skin of upper limb, including shoulder), 173.7x (Skin of lower limb, including hip), 173.8x (Other specified sites of skin), and 173.9x (Skin, site unspecified).
Among these changes, for example, you’ll find the following new codes to delineate various types of skin cancers:
- 173.60 —Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of upper limb, including shoulder
- 173.61 — Basal cell carcinoma of skin of upper limb, including shoulder
- 173.62 — Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of upper limb, including shoulder
- 173.69 — Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of upper limb, including shoulder.
The changes in the other skin cancer categories referenced above follow this pattern, with the fifth digit of “0” referring to an unspecified malignant neoplasm, “1” denoting a basal cell cancer, “2” referring to a squamous cell carcinoma,” and “9” describing another...
Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1452
Pick Up on PIN III’s Trail in Index - 2011-06-22 05:50:09-04
Question: I have a path report that says “PIN III.” My problem is that the report also says “carcinoma was not identified,” so I’m confused about what to report. Which ICD-9 code is best? Answer: With a diagnosis of PIN III, you should repo...
Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1455
HPI Know-How Helps You Catch Level 4 and 5 E/M Opportunities - 2011-06-22 05:59:05-04
Beware of CPT® and Medicare differences when counting HPI elements.
Not accurately accounting for the history of presentillness (HPI) documented by your oncologist could result in missing appropriate opportunities to report level 4 or 5 E/M visits. Ensure you’re not missing higher paying possibilities by reviewing this guide to capturing HPI elements.
Brush Up on What Qualifies as an HPI Element
HPI is one of the three parts comprising an outpatient E/M history. It describes the patient’s present illness or problem, from the first sign/symptom to the current status, and typically drives a provider’s decisions about the physical examination and treatment. “The information gathered during the physical exam (PE) portion of a patient’s evaluation often only shows a very limited picture of the patient’s problem. However, speaking with a patient and gathering the history of the patient’s problem” can help fill out the picture, explains Amanda S. Stoltman, CCS-P, compliance coder at Urology Associates in Muncie, Ind.
Start counting:
HPI also will often determine the level of service you’ll report. You’ll count the HPI elements to help you determine which level of service you can report. There are seven or eight HPI elements, depending on which source you are following. For Medicare, the eight elements are as follows:
- Location
- Quality
- Severity
- Duration
- Timing
- Context
- Modifying factors
- Associated signs and symptoms.
Medicare includes the above list in both the 1995 and 1997 E/M Documentation Guidelines, available at www.cms.gov/MLNEdWebGuide/25_EMDOC.asp.
In contrast: CPT® lists only seven HPI elements in the E/M Services Guidelines, with duration not making the list. Therefore, for Medicare and payers following its guidelines, you should consider duration and timing separately. With payers that follow AMA rules, however, be aware that they don’t consider duration and timing to be two separate elements. Rumor has it...
Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1454
CMS Proposes New Glaucoma, Skin Cancer, Dementia Codes - 2011-06-22 06:03:49-04
Many new codes abound in final update to proposed ICD-9-CM code set
If you’ve felt that your skin cancer diagnoses could use a bit more specificity, ICD-9 will deliver this October if the proposed list of new, deleted, and revised diagnosis codes becomes final. The list of ICD-9 changes was recently posted to the CMS Website, and includes the final full set of changes that the agency will make to ICD-9 codes. After the new codes take effect on Oct. 1, CMS will only add new ICD- 9 codes on an emergency basis as it prepares to switch over the diagnosis coding system to ICD-10.
Seek Out Skin Cancer Changes
You’ll find a significant expansion to the 173.x (Other malignant neoplasm of skin) categories, including changes to 173.0x (…Skin of lip), 173.1x (Eyelid, including canthus), 173.2x (Skin of ear and external auditory canal), 173.3x (Skin of other and unspecified parts of face), 173.4x (Scalp and skin of neck), 173.5x (Skin of trunk, except scrotum), 173.6x (Skin of upper limb, including shoulder), 173.7x (Skin of lower limb, including hip), 173.8x (Other specified sites of skin), and 173.9x (Skin, site unspecified).
Among these changes, for example, you’ll find the following new codes to delineate various types of skin cancers:
- 173.60 —Unspecified malignant neoplasm of skin of upper limb, including shoulder
- 173.61 — Basal cell carcinoma of skin of upper limb, including shoulder
- 173.62 — Squamous cell carcinoma of skin of upper limb, including shoulder
- 173.69 — Other specified malignant neoplasm of skin of upper limb, including shoulder.
The changes in the other skin cancer categories referenced above follow this pattern, with the fifth digit of “0” referring to an unspecified malignant neoplasm, “1” denoting a basal cell cancer, “2” referring to a squamous cell carcinoma,” and “9”...
Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1453
Qualedix, Inc. Partners with the Coding Institute to Bring Enhanced Quality and Education to its Managed Services Solution for ICD-10 Testing - 2011-06-22 10:37:49-04
Naples, FL (June 15, 2011) –Qualedix, an advanced healthcare testing organization, today announced it has partnered with the Coding Institute, LLC, a company dedicated to offering accurate healthcare solutions, that will provide native ICD-10 coding expertise and educational services to the industry leading Simplicedi testing platform.
The combined market offerings enable greater accuracy, speed and a true clinical approach to tackling the arduous task of testing thousands of new ICD-10 codes for providers and payers alike.
“At Qualedix, we strive for excellence in our data solutions for the industry and clinical knowledge is paramount to effectively remediate and test ICD-10 changes across the healthcare industry. The Coding Institute brings to a new echelon of quality and expert knowledge to better effectively serve the market through our testing managed services,” said Mark Lott, CEO of Qualedix. “Also, all of our clients need education to assist in the transition period and we are proud to have TCI as our education and training partner.”
“The Coding Institute is excited about the opportunity to partner with Qualedix to provide unmatched testing and training to help healthcare professionals implement ICD-10 compliantly and efficiently,” said Jennifer Godreau, BA, CPC, CPMA, CPEDC, Director of the SuperCoder.com and Consulting & Revenue Cycle Solutions divisions of the Coding Institute. “As the healthcare industry’s most advanced ICD-10 testing and education methodology, this managed services solution identifies key areas of focus for hospitals, insurers, and providers and allows us to prevent incorrect coding and revenue losses.”
About Qualedix
Qualedix is a professional healthcare IT quality assurance and software testing firm delivering outsourced managed testing services that leverage our expertise in healthcare and software development lifecycles. Qualedix has developed highly strategic methodologies and techniques designed to deliver critical, cost-effective solutions for 5010 and ICD-10 with highly technical testing experts, healthcare business acumen,...
Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1456
CMS Offers Great News With Fee Schedule Changes - 2011-06-24 09:02:32-04
Boost co-surgery, multiple surgery, and bilateral surgery pay for these select procedures
You’ll no longer have to eat the cost of your services if your physician acts as co-surgeon on spine revisions. Thanks to several Fee Schedule changes that CMS recently enacted. CMS had good news in MLN Matters article MM7430, which had an effective date of Jan. 1, 2011 and an implementation date of July 5, 2011.
Look for Potential Co-Surgery Payment for These Codes:
CMS will change the co-surgery indicator for spine revision codes 22212 and 22222 from “0” to “1”. Keep in mind that supporting documentation is required when billing for a co-surgeon with these procedures, so don’t forget to submit that with your claim or you’ll be looking at bad news.
Remember: If you’re billing for co-surgery, append modifier 62 (Two surgeons) to your procedure code. For modifier 62 claims, most payers pay an additional fee (generally 125 percent of the “usual” fee for the procedure, split evenly between the two surgeons). Avoid reimbursement problems by checking these claims carefully. To claim co-surgeons, each surgeon must perform a distinct portion of a single CPT procedure, and each surgeon must dictate and submit his own operative report for his portion of the surgery.
Benefit From Surgical Assist Changes:
Practices that perform sinus endoscopies will also get a potential boost from the fee schedule changes, now that you’ll see the assistant at surgery indicator change for codes 31233 and 31235 from “1” (Assistant at surgery may not be paid) to “0” (Payment restrictions for assistants at surgery applies to this procedure unless supporting documentation is submitted to establish medical necessity).
You’ll append modifier 80 to the assistant’s surgical codes if the assisting surgeon is a physician. In cases when a non-physician assists at surgery on Medicare patients, append...
Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1464
Modifier 57 Remains Handy Post Removal of Consult Codes - 2011-06-24 09:05:47-04
Take a hint from a CPT®’s global period when choosing between modifiers 25 or 57
Contrary to popular thinking, modifier 57 does not apply exclusively for consultation codes only. Medicare may have stopped paying for consult codes, but this doesn’t mean you have to stop using modifier 57. Here are two tips on how you can use this modifier to suit your practice’s needs.
Background: Starting January 1, 2010, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) eliminated consult codes from the Medicare fee schedule.
Non-Consult Inpatient Codes Keep Modifier 57 Alive
With CMS eliminated consult codes (99241-99245, 99251- 99255) for Medicare patients, you might have wondered if modifier 57 (Decision for surgery) would remain useful. The answer? You can still use this modifier for a non-consult inpatient E/M code, so long as your documentation supports it. This is because any major procedure includes E/M services the day before and the day of the procedure in the global period, says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CENTC, CPC-H, CPC-P, CPC-I, CHCC, president of CRN Healthcare Solutions, a consulting firm in Tinton Falls, N.J. “The only way you can be paid properly for an E/M performed the day before the major surgery or the day of the surgery is to indicate that it was a decision for surgery (modifier 57), which also indicates to the payer that the major procedure was not a pre-scheduled service,” she explains.
Past: Say the pulmonologist carries out a level four inpatient consult in which she figures out the patient requires thoracoscopy with pleurodesis for his recurring, persistent pleural effusion (511.9). The physician decides to perform thoracoscopy with pleurodesis the day after the consult. In this case, appending modifier 57 to the E/M code (99254, Inpatient consultation for a new or established patient, which requires these 3...
Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1462
Deem Time Essential for 493.02 Treatment Services - 2011-06-24 09:09:47-04
Learn when prolonged services should not apply.
Reporting your pulmonologist’s asthma attack treatments can be crafty business, as you can be confused about what, how and when to choose from the E/M and treatment codes that describe different situations.
Learn a few secrets of the trade from these scenarios:
Scenario 1: A patient suffering from hay fever with exacerbated asthma (493.02, Extrinsic asthma; with [acute exacerbation) requires two nebulizer treatments and 55-minute treatment time. What coding option would you report?
Scenario 2: A child patient with asthma experiences active wheezing and shortness of breath. The patient’s parent brings the child to the office, and demands the physician to see her child right away because the child is restless and screams in pain.
Dodge a Bullet by Putting Modifier 76 in Its Right Place
Some practices would report Scenario 1 using a level four established patient office visit (99214, Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, which requires at least 2 of these 3 key components: a detailed history; a detailed examination; medical decision making of moderate complexity) with prolonged services (99354, Prolonged physician service in the office or other outpatient setting requiring direct [face-to-face] patient contact beyond the usual service; first hour [List separately in addition to code for office or other outpatient Evaluation and Management service]).
They would think that the 99214 visit would include 25 minutes of face-to-face time, while 99354 would cover the additional 35 minutes. However, this is not correct coding — a common mistake of coders, says Carol Pohlig, BSN, RN, CPC, ACS, senior coding and education specialist at the University of Pennsylvania Department of Medicine in Philadelphia. “You cannot report prolonged care to account for monitoring time associated with separately billable procedures (i.e., nebulizer treatments),” she explains....
Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1460
E/M + Bronchoscopy + PFT: Unlock the Secrets to Signs and Symptoms Coding - 2011-06-24 09:20:01-04
Keep your CCI edits in mind for PFT bundles.
When a patient presents with common respiratory conditions, your pulmonologist should perform an extensive history and examination, and may order several diagnostic tests before he can settle with a definite diagnosis to report in the claim. Along with the primary diagnosis (if achieved), you should report the patient’s signs and symptoms or else risk an audit.
Consider this scenario: The pulmonologist sees a patient for fever, shortness of breath, chest pain, weight loss, and fatigue. After undergoing a detailed history and examination, the patient becomes suspect for hypersensitivity pneumonitis, otherwise known as extrinsic allergic alveolitis (495.x). The physician orders a diagnostic bronchoscopy with fluoroscopic guidance, as well as a spirometry to verify the patient’s condition. To justify each service performed by the same provider or group, you might be accumulating payer inquiries or denials. This 2-step technique should carry you through potentially puzzling spirometry-E/M coding situations.
1. Don’t Leave Out Signs and Symptoms On Your Claim
First on your to-do list is to report the patient’s signs and symptoms. In this case, you would code 780.6 (Fever and other physiologic disturbances of temperature regulation), 786.05 (Shortness of breath), 786.50 (Unspecified chest pain), 783.21 (Loss of weight), and 780.79 (Other malaise and fatigue). Because these signs and symptoms resemble other respiratory problems, the physician performs a level four E/M and orders some diagnostic tests. Report the procedures with: 31622 (Bronchoscopy, rigid or flexible, including fluoroscopic guidance, when performed; diagnostic, with cell washing, when performed [separate procedure]) for the bronchoscopy with fluoroscopic guidance. Your physician is likely to perform this on a separate date. 94010 (Spirometry, including graphic record, total and timed vital capacity, expiratory flow rate measurement[s], with or without maximal voluntary ventilation) for the pulmonary function test (PFT); and 99214 (Office...
Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1458