Your vaccine coding in 2011 will be anything but dull, thanks to changes in codes and administration reporting. Two more updates every FP should know involve new Q codes for some Medicare flu vaccines and expanded ages for adolescent vaccine counseling.

Nix 90658 in 2011

CMS has created new HCPCS codes and payment allowances to replace 90658 (Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use). Medicare will no longer pay for 90658 effective Jan. 1, 2011, so choose from the new codes instead, based on the specific product:

• Q2035 — Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use (Afluria)
• Q2036 — Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use (Flulaval)
• Q2037 — Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use (Fluvirin)
• Q2038 — Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use (Fluzone)
• Q2039 — Influenza virus vaccine, split virus, when administered to individuals 3 years of age and older, for intramuscular use (not otherwise specified).

Timing: Codes Q2035-Q2039 went into effect Oct. 1, 2010. You have two choices when filing claims for dates of service from Oct. 1, 2010 until Dec. 31, 2010: bill Medicare immediately with 90658, or hold the claim until Jan. 1, 2011 and file with the appropriate Q code. For vaccines administered after Jan. 1, 2011, only report the applicable Q code.

Explanation: Medicare pays for influenza vaccine based on 95 percent of the average wholesale price. “The products normally classifiable to 90658 have widely varying AWPs,” says Kent J. Moore, manager of...

Confused about when to choose a debridement code and an active wound code? CPT 2011 is here to your rescue with revised debridement code guidelines that clarify how to choose between the two code groups — and the key word that will tighten up your coding is depth.

“Depth is the only documentation item you need to determine the correct code,” explained Chad Rubin, MD, FACS, AMA Specialty Society Relative Value Scale Update Committee (RUC) Alternate Member with Albert E. Bothe, Jr. MD, FACS, American College of Surgeons, AMA CPT Editorial Panel Member at their joint presentation “General Surgery” at last month’s CPT Symposium in Chicago.

Active wound care, which has a 0 day global period, is for active wound care of the skin, dermis, or epidermis. For deeper wound care, use debridement codes in the appropriate location.

Example: Codes 11040 (Debridement; skin, partial thickness) and 11041 (…full thickness) have been deleted. The parenthetical note under the codes’ deletion reads, “For debridement of skin, i.e., epidermis and/or dermis only, see 97597, 97598.” The codes are revised for 2011 to reflect this change. For instance, the revision for code 11042 (Debridement, subcutaneous tissue [includes epidermis and dermis, if performed]; first 20 sq cm or less) removes “Skin, and” and adds after subcutaneous tissue “includes epidermis and dermis, if performed.”

Code 97597 is revised to (Debridement [e.g., high pressure waterjet with/without suction, sharp selective debridement with scissors, scalpel and forceps], open wound, [e.g., fibrin, devitalized epidermis and/or dermis, exudate, debris, biofilm], including topical application[s], wound assessment, use of a whirlpool, when performed and instruction[s] for ongoing care, per session, total wound[s] surface area; first 20 sq cm or less]).

Code 97597’s revision involves “mainly rewording to make clear how active wound care is separate from integumentary wound care,” Bothe explained.

CPT...

With more patients turning in for a variety of ear conditions, you cannot afford to lose any reimbursement. Look to our expert advice to ensure you’re coding correctly for all of the ear associated diagnoses.

1. Verify Documentation for E/M With 69210

Cerumen removal can present several coding challenges for your practice, particularly if the physician performs the service as a gateway to visualize the ear. Knowing when you can report 69210 (Removal impacted cerumen [separate procedure], 1 or both ears) is key to collecting for this service.

Example: Suppose a patient presents with ear pain, but the physician has to remove impacted cerumen before he can visualize the tympanic membrane. He subsequently diagnoses an ear infection. Your practice wants to bill an office visit and modifier along with 69210 – is that acceptable?

Key: “Whether to report 69210 is always a value judgment because if you just flick a little wax aside to visualize the eardrum, you shouldn’t bill for cerumen removal,” says Charles Scott, MD, FAAP, with Advocare Medford Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine in New Jersey. “Typically, I’ll use that code if I have to use a special device that allows me to curette the ear before I can visualize the tympanic membrane,” he advises.

The July 2005 CPT Assistant states that cerumen is considered “impacted” in several circumstances, one of which is, “cerumen impairs exam of clinically significant portions of the external auditory canal, tympanic membrane, or middle ear condition.” Therefore, if the cerumen is blocking the physician’s view and he has to use special instrumentation to remove it above and beyond irrigation, most payers allow you to report 69210.

You should ensure that you have separate documentation of the E/M service and procedure to support reporting both codes. Some practices overuse 69210, which means many insurers...

If you’ve been looking for a code on colon motility study and being frustrated for the lack of it, your search is over. CPT 2011 debuts a new code for a manometric study, along with two revised codes for esophageal pH monitoring.

For gastroenterology, you have a lot of changes to sort through — many involving deletions on low use codes or clean-up work.

Here’s How to Use New Manometric Study Codes

You should pay attention on two new codes for a manometric study: 91117 (Colon motility [manometric] study, minimum 6 hours continuous recording [including provocation tests, e.g., meal, intracolonic balloon distension, pharmacologic agents, if performed], with interpretation and report), and 91013 (Esophageal motility [manometric study of the esophagus and/or gastroesophageal junction] study with interpretation and report; with stimulation or perfusion during 2-dimensional data study [e.g., stimulant, acid or alkali perfusion] [List separately in addition to code for primary procedure]).

CPT 91117 is just for the study itself, not for the same session with catheter placement. The radiologist may place the catheter in a prior procedure and the gastroenterologist may come in and out to supervise the testing and any provocations that are performed. Thus, you should include the provocations in the study and report 97117 only once no matter how many times the testing is done.

You can use 91013 in cases like assessment of the effect on the measured esophageal motility when the patient’s esophagus is exposed to different stimulant liquids, says Michael Weinstein, MD, a gastroenterologist in Washington, D.C., and former member of the AMA’s CPT Advisory Panel. The code also applies when intravenous medications are administered to try to produce symptoms. CPT 91010 is included in 91013 and would not be billed separately, he adds.

Use 91034, 91035 in a New Way

Aside from debuting...