Medical Coding Pro - Hip Arthroscopy, Observation Receive CPT 2011 Coding Updates

Published: Fri, 10/15/10


As a benefit for being on our mailing list we are sending out a
weekly update including links to the most recent posts on our
blog. If you would like to read further just click one of the links.
 
Kind Regards,
The Medical Coding Pro Team

Great Deal On Practice Exams
http://www.medicalcodingpro.com/store.html

Membership Site Trial Offer Only $1
http://www.medicalcodingpro.com/join-us-elite-group.html

Medical Coding Pro
Coders Destination for Information
http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress





Hip Arthroscopy, Observation Receive CPT 2011 Coding Updates - 2010-09-30 14:33:49-04

2991x, 9922x medical procedure CPT 2011 codes added.

If you’ve been frustrated about the lack of arthroscopic hip surgery codes that CPT offers, CPT 2011 will change that, with three new codes that debut on Jan. 1.

In fact, CPT will introduce over 200 new codes in 2011 to help keep your coding more specific than ever, spanning several categories, from dermatology to orthopedics to cardiology, and beyond.

In orthopedics, you’ll benefit from the following three hip arthroscopy codes, which will be excellent additions to CPT.

Check out New Observation Codes

CPT adds to your E/M coding options with the introduction of three new observation codes, as follows:

...



Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1185



ICD-9, CCI 16.3, Oct MPFS Coding Updates in SuperCoder.com - 2010-10-01 13:23:12-04
You can sit back and enjoy the fall foliage spectacle — SuperCoder.com’s got your ICD-9-CM 2011, National Correct Coding Initiative 16.3, and October Medicare Physician Fee Schedule medical coding updates covered. Go ahead and search for th...

Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1186



96110 Modifier Requirements Change Again - 2010-10-11 06:05:58-04

BC/BS UHC, tell coder to halt 96110-59 denials with 96110-79.

If you’re ready to bill 96110 and 96110-59, think again.

One office was billing 96110 (Developmental testing; limited [e.g., Developmental Screening Test II, Early Language Milestone Screen], with interpretation and report) with modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service). BlueCross/BlueShield (BC/BS), UnitedHealthcare (UHC), and other insurers were denying the 96110-59s. “I called BC/BS on 8-19-2010 and was told that we should be using a 76 (Repeat procedure or service by the same physician) modifier instead,” reports Bonnie Palmer, with Lawrenceville Pediatrics in Georgia. “I also called UHC and was told the same thing.”

96110 x 2 or 96110-59 Is Technically Correct

Modifier 59 rather than 76 more appropriately describes two distinct 96110s. When you’re reporting two 96110s, you’re doing so to represent two different tests, not a repeat second test as modifier 76 represents. That being said, the American Academy of Pediatrics prefers that you report multiple 96110s using units rather than any modifier.

Two 96110s indicate that the second developmental test is a separate test. Staff administered — or the parent completed — two different tests, such as the Ages and Stages Questionnaire (ASQ) and the Modified Checklist for Autism in Toddlers (MCHAT) — and that the physician interpreted and documented the tests’ interpretation.

Before Using Repeat Method, Obtain Proof

Modifier 76 instead indicates that the second test was repeated. The modifier appropriately describes cases in which staff has to readminister the same test and the physician has to reinterpret the results.

In practice, the old adage is best to follow: Get the policy in writing. If you obtain a modifier directive from an insurer to use modifier 76 for multiple 96110s – either from the payer’s Web site or an email confirmation, save the documentation – and then adhere...



Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1188



Medicare Medically Unlikely Edits MythBuster Stops Practice Pay Losses - 2010-10-15 06:14:52-04

Medically unlikely edits ignorance could be causing you medical coding claim  denials.

Ensure you’re not letting medically unlikely edits (MUEs) wreak havoc on your urology practice’s coding and reimbursement by uncovering the truth about four aspects of these edits.

Myth 1: MUE Edits Don’t Affect Your Practice

Some practices feel that they don’t need to worry about MUEs.

Reality: “They limit the frequency a CPT code can be used,” says Chandra L. Hines, business office manager at Capital Urological Associates in Raleigh, N.C. “With our specialty of urology, we need to become aware of the denials and not let every denial go because the insurance company said it was an MUE. We should all be aware of MUEs as they occur, and we cannot always control whether or not we will receive payment.”

The MUE list includes specific CPT or HCPCS codes, followed by the number of units that CMS will pay. CMS developed the MUEs to reduce paid claims error rates in the Medicare Program. The first edits were implemented in January 2007, although some of the edits themselves became public in October 2008.

Some MUEs deal with anatomical impossibilities while others edit automatically the number of units of service you can bill for a service in any 24-hour period. Still others limit codes according to CMS policy. For example, excision of a hydrocele, bilateral (55041) has a bilateral indicator of “2,” so you should never bill two or more units of this code. Additional edits focus on the nature of the equipment for testing, the study or procedure, or pathology specimen.

Anatomical example: The MUEs edit out and deny an erroneously coded claim for a circumcision (54161, Circumcision, surgical excision other than clamp, device or dorsal slit; older than 28 days of age) for a patient...



Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1190



Is 44145 the CPT code for Lap-to-Open Colectomy? - 2010-10-15 06:32:03-04
Question: What codes would you use for lower anterior resection with anal anastomosis and divered ileostomy with mobilization of splenic flexure, which was converted to an open procedure? Answer: You’ll report the open procedure codes for this case. ...

Read more: http://medicalcodingpro.com/wordpress/archives/1189